Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-31780004-20180203180720/@comment-32929083-20180204063055

Galderhorn wrote: Alex50529 wrote: 1. Yes, rambo is overpriced but for good reason, it only takes up 5 energy.

2. Bat is not better than Rambo nor is Rambo better than Bat. The bat hits more zombies at once however takes up much more energy then the Rambo does, the Rambo is good for stopping individual zombies.

3. They are bad weapons, yes, but they are overpriced so that the player can get some more experience on the game (not exp) before trying out new weapons.

4. Tombstone is more of a joke thing to build, do you really see anyone building tombstones, heck even using hammer outside of farming maps.

5. It's the owner's choice, a way of supporting the game.

2. Bat has the price of 15 for 4 zombies while rambo has the price of 20 for 4 zombies

3. They're total rip-offs. If anything, a player shouldn't grind for that long especially with bad start weapons for a worse weapon.

4. Tombstone could be useful to prevent beginners pretty much having a ticker with more health

5. It's only cosmetic, though it is overpriced for a single change. That having to be randomized too.

3. they are both better than the remington