Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-37670238-20190522211104/@comment-37670238-20190523095525

=( Lost Ratchet )= wrote: Davojak, it all ties in to HOW you have said it. You do not seem to have evidence of your claim - therefore, what a moderator has warned you for may have been justified by default. That's reality - No proof, your story is bullshit and encouraging drama by posting this on the wiki - like, anyone would want to see you getting infuriated at all...

I state this because I am an Ex In-Game moderator, and I see many upon many that would use terms such as Faker, Shat etc to bypass a Green Warn. Like I said, it's how you say it and imply that context is what gets you in trouble in the first place and go off thinking you have done nothing wrong - which in my experience never helps anyone but prove the moderator's point. I can personally tell you that banning people for using certain forms of language is rediculous, but rules are rules - you either follow and respect them, or face what is easily avoidable by not typing in the first place. It's that simple, but then again, people never truely learn anything until karma hits them.

This is just my overall opinion however, rules vastly change from time to time. Check my wall for the proof.

Also check the wall of that fake PR