Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-26113984-20151108040458/@comment-26113984-20151112010542

NoobOfAges wrote: Wiki Doge wrote: " I think there's implicit and exclusive rules about discussing Wiki Doge's ideas, I just haven't figured them out yet."  @JoJ: I have mild IED so you can blame that if I come off as  excessively  mad so a stupid/no reason.

" Wait, I have a really serious question (It's not gonna be the vine joke)"  @Slurp:  Then ask.

@NLB: ' ''I doubt a 2D pant can cause game breaking lag, unless your PC is extremely bad. '''

@NoobAges:  "You must be blind. Anyting that I said can be backed up by previous arguments. Your ignorance is great." I re-read most of your comments, and you have yet to provide a shread of evidence to back up anything you said.

" you know you can't win the argument when you resort to calling people nazis."

'''I called you "Krieg", which is the German word for "war". And I wasn't refering to a n@z*, I was comparing you to Love and Krieg a former admin abuser from the previous wikia. Whenever someone suggested an idea Krieg would blindlessly hate on the suggestion just for the sake of hating (much like what you are doing.)'''

" And that is how to lose players"

'''In addition to what Dog Crap said about PF and AR, Phantom Forces and Apoc Rising are just two examples of games that force remove your appearl, yet they maintain they spots on the front page (each getting about 3-4k+ plays a day). And its not just those two games. Games like Mad Paintball, TMM, MM, HEX, W@APP also remove whatever you are wearing and yet they get absolutly no hate for it.'''

" no one reply? ok, so idea fail."

'''The number of supports a number gets does not equate to the idea quality. Plus, a large number of users on this wikia don't support an idea unless 1.) they can criticise  it 2.) its published by an admin, 3.) Involves hatred against R2D or PR. you still got banned even if you didn't mean it because even other people think you meant it. lol wikidoge has to resort to personal attacks to win arguments. Lawl, he didn't attempt to argue against my last argument because he new he can't refute it. '''

'''Anyways, NoobAges has failed to maintain that this idea is trash, and that the community will react negativly to it. Also, he has failed to provide any legit arguments and has also been unsuccessful in refuting against my arguments, whereas I countered all of his. I think its clear who the real winner is. '''