Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-30631371-20161209001316/@comment-26884596-20161211235555

Jaythelosthero wrote: Iron ISO wrote: Fishcake123 wrote: Iron ISO wrote: Jaythelosthero wrote: No more irrelevant guns from the past. We need guns that fit in with today's standards. I'm tired of crap guns that can't hold a solid magazine, a solid ROF, good amount of damage, doesn't overheat within 4 shots, or has accuracy like a drunk one legged man with a sawed-off shotgun. What we need are guns like Kalashnikovs, AR-15s, various European guns, and etc. Just simply no. Ey, ain't R2DA around 60s-90s? Thompson was in the 40s and is dead Thompson was still used in Vietnam until mid 60s soo, that explains why we still carry one Look, I'm just tired of all these weapons from the past being brought back up for some reason. More specifically how for some reason in the year 2016 someone though it'd be a good idea to reforge and mass produce many guns that simply aren't up to today's standards. Take the spas for example. It's too heavy and made in the 1980s, thus giving us a time period to evaluate our weapons. Sure, Thompsons are about 80 years old, but they can still hit a target for more than a couple yards. All the weapons, in my opinion, are portrayed quite poorly. the minigun was made in 1963, so