Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-29781728-20190620192350/@comment-39130302-20190728092309

Cloudist wrote: the fact this thread is alive concerns me. it still remians how little the developers (including pr himself) listen to his community; the same thing keeping the game alive. instead of adding weapons and zombies peope genuinely would want (that one cyborg zombie was rlly cool) these ideas are idmediately ignored and different features are pushed out. like, nobody asked for a p90 but now we got one and its by far one of the most over powered guns in the game. place doesnt care about balancing and his crooked idea of balancing is all wrong. i know its 95k but thats too little for that it does. instead of adding new guns and nerfing zombies the community has asked to be nerfed for awhile the moderators and developers decide to act like girls and sink themselves in drama like a bunch of brittanys.

r2da does suck and ill admit it. when pr actually does decide to balance something, like i mentioned earlier, its usually where its uneeded. pr is going to nerf the ck and barret in the next update.

why?

i really dont know. theyre all extremely balanced. i went around asking users who played TDM/FFA/any pvp and for the most part none of them thought that the barret nor ck is too op. barret acts as a normal sniper. it has .50 cal in its name for a reason. it does a lot of damage on a body shot and will literally blow your head off with a headshot. balanced, right? best sniper should do the most damage. and the ck is a horrible gun already. it has like what, 12 bullets, TOTAL? paired up with the fact that its range and accuracy is terrible, its ROF is bad, and the survivor health was buffed to 200, its damn near impossible to kill. but nooooo. the problem is that pr keeps listening to toxic newbies that only play the game for a short amount of time and leave while making the game for high ranks at the same time. the game's concept is great but executed poorly. pr just want that $