Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-30986852-20170102194948/@comment-31018335-20170102222926

Jaythelosthero wrote: QuienesSombra wrote:

AK-47 is no doubt better than Kalashnikova, total damage doesn't matter, because the only way to get total damage is to only shoot brutes, basically. DPS should be weighed more over total damage. Total damage indicates how much damage you can deal before you exhaust your ammo reserves. The less total damage, the more zombies you could potentially kill. The Kalashnikova can kill more zombies than an AK-47 can, albeit slower. What I'm saying is, the total damage you are listing is the total ammo multiplied by damage. But, in a lot of cases, you will only get to do a fraction of that total damage, due to shooting partly damaged zombies. In the perfect scenario, the Kalashnikova will do 3375, but in many other cases, it won't. The fact that you can kill a regular zombie in 4 shots with the AK instead of 5 with the Kalashnikova is the biggest upside.