Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-28829368-20170224025149/@comment-26466669-20170225194601

Numbee wrote:

Codered1245 wrote:

Numbee wrote:

Codered1245 wrote: A AK-47 with 45 damage and 660 fire rate would be ridiculous. 28 damage with 440 firerate would make the Thompson useless. I rather use the wingmaster or even the M16 at that level. Charged brute is fine and fun to fight and use. I have killed them before, they require teamwork to kill. I also don't see them too often as I kill every elm I see and let none of them run away. Survivors still win several games I have played in. Guest kick is to counter hackers. Guest kicking for no reason is getting rarer as it is a punishable offense. who said thompson was good I have read several people on here say it is good. I used it all the way to rank 18 when I got Spas. Thompson is slightly better up close than the AK and AK is better at farther ranges. Thompson with its high damage and slow firerate provides longevity for the magazine. They both have niches for their uses. I have used both to success in games.

Found this quote on the Thompson page by Cyrogenes

"As someone who mains the AK because of its high accuracy, I also use the Tommy almost as much, and here's why:



Isn't a high dmg, low rof gun good for ammo conservation/longetivity? The fact that both the AK and Tommy have a similar clip size (AK's 35 and Tommy's 30), as well as virtually the same DPS shows that the Tommy has the capability to perform better close range than the AK because of just how long a Tommy mag survives before actually being depleted.



A durable clip like the Tommys makes it decently useful against hordes of low-mid hp zombies, since you won't run out of ammo as fast as the AK or such. Also w orth noting that there's around 50% more total dmg per clip with a Tommy when compared to the AK.



but i guess people dont realize this bc "tommy doesnt shoot fast bad gun lo xdxdxd"



tldr:

low rof and high dmg means long-lasting (yet still dps- effective) clip, which is really good for hordes of non-tanky zombies"

Your changes to the two guns will make one of the guns completely useless and the other to become Famas 2.0. alright, but if we switch the stats completely, that sure would be good

plus, if you own a thompson which you will most likely get before ak, you're pretty much fine without the ak-47

so from your sayings, thompson is sorta already a famas Switching the stats would significantly buff and completely ruin another. That isn't fair for fans of the Thompson They have completely different uses. AK-47 is for longer range engagements while the Thompson offers longevity in its magazine. No the Thompson is not a Famas cause it lacks the high fire rate of the AK. The reason why the AK can match the DPS of the Thompson, even succeeds it according to the wiki page, is because of its fire rate. It's like you're not even reading what I'm typing. If PR wanted a high damage automatic with a high firerate he would have already added it. After R2D he will not add them.