Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-34781143-20191214211502/@comment-32897163-20191225174011

Gonna go on a small rant here.

There's literally 0 arguments to defend boo buster. The only way to be immune to boo buster is to use the boo blast, which is a LIMITED item, as you said.

There's also faraday, but it's expensive. Keep in mind FFA rounds are quick 3 min rounds and that 260 adds up rapidly. Also, as a prestiege player, I cannot even buy it yet.

They also say to use a grenade...but really, it's so easy to dodge a grenade anyway with something like duck mount. Also yea flak vest.

"use a sniper" I get some weapons are better to fight with a sniper, like shotguns. But even then, most of the time sniper users go in close quarters to test their skill. Even though a shotgun can oneshot you in cqc, sniper users still have a chance to fight back. Now with boo buster, that chance is legit 0, there is no way you can fight back against a boo buster in cqc.

Draws are boring and lame. Apparently the way to counter boo buster is to simply be bored I guess. Boo users most likely already made all the money they spent on armor and such back from their kills, and so they just sit and wait. Isn't that a bit unfair...considering how stupidly easy it is to kill people with boo.

And now...the argument boo defenders have no answer to. How do we deal spawning next to a boo user? Hm...we already said faraday is too expensive, and boo blast is a limited item. Hmm....it's almost like...ah...boo buster shouldn't be allowed in pvp.

"youre just mad" Yeah...?? Why wouldn't someone be mad after being flung into water for the past 5 rounds..?

They'll most likely just say, "just dont play pvp", as if that'll solve anything. That contradicting statement simply proves how powerful boo is.

So if PR adds a broken weapon to zombies, should I just say, "just stop playing lol"?

Thank you for making this thread, but most won't even read what you said and repeat the same "use nade, use sniper" argument 100 times.